Why the Rabbit R1 FLOPPED

ISSUE 028

Welcome to the 28th edition of Curious Hours

We’re finally back with another edition of Curious Hours and a lot has happened since we last uploaded a issue of Curious Hours but we’re going to get right into it.

Core Issues with the Rabbit R1

Marques Brownlee, widely recognised as MKBHD in the tech world, recently directed sharp criticism toward the Rabbit R1, a portable AI assistant, labelling it "barely reviewable." This strong condemnation comes on the heels of a similarly negative review of the Humane AI Pin, suggesting a broader issue within the AI product landscape.

The Rabbit R1, designed by Teenage Engineering, comes with an intriguing mix of features. It incorporates a swivelling camera for multimodal AI interaction, a scroll wheel, a built-in screen, and a USB-C port. It also includes a SIM card tray for connectivity, promising a unique blend of AI-enhanced assistance with portability. However, despite this assortment of technological tools, Brownlee found the device to be deeply flawed, primarily criticising its lack of basic features and unreliability.

Battery Life and Charging Problems: According to Brownlee, the device's battery life is its Achilles' heel, needing multiple charges daily while still running out before the morning. The Rabbit R1 is intended to be an AI assistant that can facilitate users' daily tasks, but its inability to sustain power renders it practically unusable. Such issues undermine the primary value proposition of portable AI devices​ (Benzinga)​.

Functional Inadequacy: The Rabbit R1's core functions, like recording videos, setting alarms, and sending emails, were either absent or poorly executed. Brownlee highlighted how the Rabbit R1 struggled with these basic tasks, which should be essential for any modern smart device. Its slow response times, often due to a sensor sensitivity issue, further compounded the frustration. Additionally, the AI was reported to confidently provide "hallucinated" answers to user queries, an indication that the device was not ready for commercial deployment​ (Digg)​.

User Interface Limitations: Despite the presence of a touch screen, Brownlee observed that its usability was severely limited. The screen could only be used effectively in certain modes like terminal typing, which made navigation cumbersome. Users typically expect intuitive touch screens on smart devices, but the Rabbit R1 fell short.

Price-to-Value Imbalance: Given these limitations, Brownlee found the $200 price point unjustifiable. He compared this to the Humane AI Pin, which was similarly overpriced at $700. The high price tags of these AI devices, despite their glaring deficiencies, exemplified a troubling trend of delivering underdeveloped products while charging premium prices.

Response from Rabbit R1

In the face of Brownlee's critique, Rabbit R1's CEO Jesse Lyu took a constructive approach. Rather than dismiss the review, Lyu acknowledged the challenges the company faced in bringing an innovative product to market. He expressed gratitude for the feedback, promising improvements through over-the-air (OTA) software updates to address bugs and enhance features. He also highlighted the difficulties of a small team in rapidly iterating while keeping pace with the evolving demands of AI​ (ReadWrite)​.

Broader Implications

Brownlee's critique of the Rabbit R1 and Humane AI Pin brings to light the broader challenges facing the AI industry. Companies, eager to capture market share and capitalise on consumer interest in AI, often rush products to market before they are fully tested and refined. This results in consumer products with ambitious concepts but poor execution, leading to user dissatisfaction and, ultimately, brand damage. Brownlee highlighted how these rushed products lead to an "exhausting" user experience, as devices struggle to meet even basic requirements, let alone deliver a seamless, helpful AI interaction.

The influence of tech reviewers like Brownlee in shaping public perception cannot be understated. His reviews wield significant power in influencing consumer decisions. The backlash from the Rabbit R1 review sparked debates about the responsibility of reviewers and their potential impact on small companies. Some argued that even minor criticism from such influential figures could be detrimental to fledgling tech companies, risking their financial stability. Nevertheless, the review community plays an essential role in holding companies accountable and advocating for better, more reliable products.

We’ve now come to the end of the newsletter and we have returned and we also JUST launched Curious Hygiene which we hope that our subscribers can also support us on our new venture.

Also share the newsletter to friends and family using the link below:

Contact us on email:

[email protected] for any enquires, questions or feedback on our newsletter.

Get in touch personally with our emails:

[email protected] (Founder of Curious Hours, Curious Hygiene and Tech Hygiene | Over 300k YouTube Views on AI Meets Football | Author and researcher of Curious Hours Content)

[email protected] (AI Enthusiastic Member & Contributor of Curious Hours)